From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyd v. Rausch Coleman Performance Group, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Nov 1, 2011
No. 4:10CV01612 JLH (E.D. Ark. Nov. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. 4:10CV01612 JLH.

November 1, 2011


ORDER


On September 29, 2011, Rausch Coleman Performance Group, LLC, filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 37(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because the plaintiff, Wynter Adonnis Boyd, failed to appear at her deposition despite proper notice. On September 30, 2011, Rausch Coleman also filed a motion for summary judgment. Boyd did not respond to either motion. On October 24, 2011, the Court entered an Order notifying Boyd that if she failed to respond to those two motions by the close of business on Monday, October 31, 2011, the Court would assume that she does not oppose the motions and would act accordingly. Boyd has not filed a response. Rausch Coleman has presented a prima facie case of entitlement to summary judgment. In the absence of any response, the motion is GRANTED. Document #27.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Boyd v. Rausch Coleman Performance Group, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Nov 1, 2011
No. 4:10CV01612 JLH (E.D. Ark. Nov. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Boyd v. Rausch Coleman Performance Group, LLC

Case Details

Full title:WYNTER ADONNIS BOYD PLAINTIFF v. RAUSCH COLEMAN PERFORMANCE GROUP, LLC…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division

Date published: Nov 1, 2011

Citations

No. 4:10CV01612 JLH (E.D. Ark. Nov. 1, 2011)