From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyd v. Doctor

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Feb 3, 2010
Civ. Action No. 07-769 (FSH) (D.N.J. Feb. 3, 2010)

Opinion

Civ. Action No. 07-769 (FSH).

February 3, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff Donald E. Boyd, appearing pro se, appeals the November 16, 2009 Order of Magistrate Judge Shwartz (the "Order"), denying Plaintiff's application to substitute the names of three doctors for fictitiously named defendants in the Complaint; and the Court having reviewed the Order, and the submissions of the parties pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; and

it appearing that Judge Shwartz denied Plaintiff's request because: (1) Plaintiff failed to provide a copy of his proposed amended pleading with his application, as is required by L. Civ. R. 7.1(f); (2) Judge Shwartz found that Plaintiff's delay in seeking the amendment "prejudices the other parties as they are unable to investigate the new claims . . . particularly since discovery closed on October 13, 2009;" and (3) the Final Pre-Trial Order was entered on November 2, 2009, but "Plaintiff made no mention of these proposed defendants" in his narrative statement of facts incorporated in that Order, and amendments to the Final Pre-Trial Order are only permitted upon a showing of manifest injustice; and

it appearing that by Order dated December 17, 2009, this Court ordered that discovery be re-opened for the Defendants named in the First Amended Complaint, and that the Final Pre-Trial Order be vacated; and

it appearing that Plaintiff attached a copy of his proposed amended pleading (the "Second Amended Complaint") to his appeal papers, and that the only change between the Second Amended Complaint and the First Amended Complaint is the substitution of Dr. Hershkowitz, Dr. Samual Sostre, and Ms. Alexis Fitzsimons for the fictitiously named defendants; and

it appearing, therefore, that Magistrate Judge Shwartz's reasons for denying Plaintiff's application are now moot; and

for good cause shown;

IT IS on this 3rd day of February 2010,

ORDERED that the November 16, 2009 Order by Magistrate Judge Shwartz [Docket No. 60] is VACATED, and Plaintiff's application for leave to file the Second Amended Complaint to substitute the names of certain defendants is GRANTED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the Second Amended Complaint [Docket. No. 72-2]; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), the Clerk shall issue summons for the new Defendants, Dr. Hershkowitz, Dr. Samual Sostre, and Ms. Alexis Fitzsimons, and the United States Marshal shall serve summons and copies of the Second Amended Complaint upon Defendants Dr. Hershkowitz, Dr. Samual Sostre, and Ms. Alexis Fitzsimons, as well as Defendants Lt. Stio, Paul Acakios, Brian Pell, Chris Sloma, Michael Laplaca, Officer Bracero, Officer Dixon, Dolores Guida, Joann Parker, and Nurse P. Panzer, with all costs of service advanced by the United States.

Plaintiff is reminded that he must complete U.S. Marshal form 285 for each named Defendant to be served. The completed forms shall be returned to the U.S. Marshal's Office by February 26, 2010 at the following address:

UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S OFFICE
50 Walnut Street
Room 2009
Newark, NJ 07101


Summaries of

Boyd v. Doctor

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Feb 3, 2010
Civ. Action No. 07-769 (FSH) (D.N.J. Feb. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Boyd v. Doctor

Case Details

Full title:DONALD E. BOYD, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE DOCTOR, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Feb 3, 2010

Citations

Civ. Action No. 07-769 (FSH) (D.N.J. Feb. 3, 2010)