From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyce v. Weber

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 7, 2021
19-CV-3825 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2021)

Opinion

19-CV-3825 (JMF)

07-07-2021

JASON BOYCE, Plaintiff, v. BRUCE WEBER and LITTLE BEAR, INC., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JESSE M. FURMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

In this case, Jason Boyce, a former fashion model, brings claims against Bruce Weber, a well-known fashion photographer, and Weber's production company, Little Bear, Inc., for sexual harassment and discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law. § 290 et seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law, N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-101 et seq., and for sex trafficking under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (“TVPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1591 et seq. Citing pretrial publicity and the “#metoo” movement, Defendants move for the use of a written jury questionnaire in connection with voir dire. See ECF No. 155. Notably, Defendants do not, and indeed could not, suggest that the use of a written questionnaire is mandated - or, to put it differently, that failure to use a written questionnaire would be error. To the contrary, they acknowledge that the Court has “broad discretion in conducting voir dire.” ECF No. 156, at 7; see United States v. Treacy, 639 F.3d 32, 47 (2d Cir. 2011) (citing cases in which the Second Circuit had “express[ly] disavow[ed] . . . the notion that questionnaires could ever be a required part of voir dire” and observed “that the methodology of voir dire is not only within the district court's discretion but ‘quintessentially' so” (emphasis added)). Exercising that broad discretion and considering the totality of the circumstances presented here (including the extent of the publicity to date and the passage of time since many of the events cited by Defendants), the Court denies Defendants' motion. Although this case and Mr. Weber have been the subject of some publicity, and trial would likely garner some media attention, the Court is confident that searching oral voir dire will suffice to ensure the selection of a fair and impartial jury. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 155.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Boyce v. Weber

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 7, 2021
19-CV-3825 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Boyce v. Weber

Case Details

Full title:JASON BOYCE, Plaintiff, v. BRUCE WEBER and LITTLE BEAR, INC., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 2021

Citations

19-CV-3825 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2021)