From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyce v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 22, 2013
CASE NO. 3:12-cv-285 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 22, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:12-cv-285

02-22-2013

RAMON BOYCE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, London Correctional Institution, Respondent.


Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

[ ] Jury Verdict: This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the Jury has rendered its verdict.

[×] Decision by Court: This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 15) of the United States Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; the Petition is DISMISSED with prejudice; any request for a certificate of appealability would be DENIED and an appeal of this Order would not be taken in objective good faith; and the case is TERMINATED from the docket.

JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

By: M. Rogers

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Boyce v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 22, 2013
CASE NO. 3:12-cv-285 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Boyce v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:RAMON BOYCE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, London Correctional Institution…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 22, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 3:12-cv-285 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 22, 2013)