From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyce v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 21, 2017
533 S.W.3d 280 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

WD 80138

11-21-2017

Demetrius L. BOYCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Natalie Hull Hoge, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.


Natalie Hull Hoge, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, and James Edward Welsh and Karen King Mitchell, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

Demetrius L. Boyce appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Boyce argues that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to seek suppression of the victim's pre-trial and in-court identifications of Boyce as the person who committed the crimes. Finding no error of law, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Boyce v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 21, 2017
533 S.W.3d 280 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Boyce v. State

Case Details

Full title:Demetrius L. BOYCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Nov 21, 2017

Citations

533 S.W.3d 280 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)