From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Box v. City of Goldsmith

State of Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals
Apr 17, 2014
No. 11-13-00371-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 17, 2014)

Opinion

No. 11-13-00371-CV

04-17-2014

JERRY BOX, Appellant v. CITY OF GOLDSMITH, TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 70th District Court

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. A-134,288


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Jerry Box, filed a notice of appeal on November 15, 2013. According to the district clerk, Appellant has not filed a designation of record, paid for the clerk's record, or made arrangements to pay for it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a). We notified Appellant by letter that the clerk's record is past due, that Appellant must resolve this matter by April 8, 2014, and that this appeal would be subject to dismissal if Appellant failed to timely resolve this matter. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not done so.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
Willson, J., and Bailey, J.


Summaries of

Box v. City of Goldsmith

State of Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals
Apr 17, 2014
No. 11-13-00371-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 17, 2014)
Case details for

Box v. City of Goldsmith

Case Details

Full title:JERRY BOX, Appellant v. CITY OF GOLDSMITH, TEXAS, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 17, 2014

Citations

No. 11-13-00371-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 17, 2014)