From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowman v. Bowman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 3, 1987
504 So. 2d 808 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-1693.

April 3, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Sarasota County, Robert J. Boylston, J.

John M. Strickland of Livingston, Patterson Strickland, Sarasota, for appellant.

Edwin T. Mulock and Lucinda Meekins Stathis of Law Office of Mulock Birkhold, Bradenton, for appellee.


We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the wife rehabilitative alimony. The facts of this case do not warrant an award of permanent alimony at this time. However, should the wife not become rehabilitated prior to the expiration of the rehabilitative alimony period, she may file a petition to continue the rehabilitative alimony or convert it to permanent alimony. Lee v. Lee, 309 So.2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SANDERLIN, J., concur.


Summaries of

Bowman v. Bowman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 3, 1987
504 So. 2d 808 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Bowman v. Bowman

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN J. BOWMAN, APPELLANT, v. TED K. BOWMAN, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 3, 1987

Citations

504 So. 2d 808 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)