Bowles v. Stolc

Full title: DANIEL TREVOR BOWLES, Petitioner, v. BRUNO STOLC, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

CV 08-5021-DMG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)

Opinion

DANIEL TREVOR BOWLES, Petitioner, v. BRUNO STOLC, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 08-5021-DMG (JEM) United States District Court, C.D. California. October 26, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections and Supplemental Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissing this action with prejudice.