From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowie v. Henderson Police Dep't

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 28, 2013
520 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-2448 No. 13-1131

05-28-2013

EDWARD BOWIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, Defendants - Appellees.

Edward Bowie, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:12-cv-00514-FL) Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Bowie, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Edward Bowie appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bowie v. Henderson Police Dep't, No. 5:12-cv-00514-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2012 & Jan. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Bowie v. Henderson Police Dep't

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 28, 2013
520 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Bowie v. Henderson Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD BOWIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 28, 2013

Citations

520 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2013)