From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowes v. Amcare Senior Life Partners

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 14, 2022
4:20CV00170 JM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 14, 2022)

Opinion

4:20CV00170 JM

09-14-2022

LINDSAY BOWES v. AMCARE SENIOR LIFE PARTNERS, INC. PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT


ORDER

James M. Moody Jr. United States District Judge.

Pending is Plaintiff's motion for a ruling. (Doc. No. 13). On March 4, 2021 the parties filed a joint motion for approval of settlement. On May 5, 2021 the Court granted the motion in part approving the settlement agreement but denying the request for fees. The Court directed the Plaintiff to submit a separate motion for attorney's fees which include the itemized billing records. The Plaintiff did not file a separate motion as directed. Instead, on May 14, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal. Because a joint stipulation by both parties does not require action by the Court, the Clerk closed the case. Plaintiff now seeks a ruling arguing that she does not seek approval by the Court as to their fee agreement and requesting an order dismissing the case with prejudice. Plaintiff's counsel is well aware that this Court considers approval of the fee agreement to be required in FSLA actions. Plaintiff's motion for a ruling is DENIED.

As previously ordered, Plaintiff is directed to file a motion for approval of attorney's fees including their billing records. Plaintiff is also directed to provide evidence of their settlement negotiations.

IT IS ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bowes v. Amcare Senior Life Partners

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 14, 2022
4:20CV00170 JM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Bowes v. Amcare Senior Life Partners

Case Details

Full title:LINDSAY BOWES v. AMCARE SENIOR LIFE PARTNERS, INC. PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Sep 14, 2022

Citations

4:20CV00170 JM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 14, 2022)