From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowers v. Cal. State Prison Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 24, 2023
2:22-cv-01919-DAD-AC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01919-DAD-AC (PC)

01-24-2023

LAQUINTON D. BOWERS, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING ACTION DUE TO PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM (DOC. NO. 5)

Plaintiff LaQuinton D. Bowers is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 29, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed, without leave to amend, due to plaintiff's failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. No. 5.) Those pending findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objection thereto were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days after service.

On January 5, 2023, plaintiff filed a form notice of appeal that stating that the filing is plaintiff's objections to the findings and recommendations. (Doc. No. 8 at 1.) This form document does not contain any explanation of any objections to the pending findings and recommendations that plaintiff may have. Accordingly, plaintiff's filing provides no basis upon which to reject the pending findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including plaintiff's objections, the court concludes that the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on November 29, 2022 (Doc. No. 5) are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed without leave to amend due to plaintiff's failure to state a claim; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bowers v. Cal. State Prison Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 24, 2023
2:22-cv-01919-DAD-AC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Bowers v. Cal. State Prison Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:LAQUINTON D. BOWERS, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON SACRAMENTO, et…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 24, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01919-DAD-AC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2023)