From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowerman v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Sep 2, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-H-07-1925 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 2, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-H-07-1925.

September 2, 2008


ORDER


This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed on August 7, 2008 and made a de novo determination of the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition. Rule 72(b), Fed.R.Civ.P.; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). This court finds that the Administrative Law Judge's decision was supported by substantial evidence in the record and that the proper legal standards were appropriately applied. This court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court's Memorandum and Order, granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment and denying the plaintiff's motion. Final judgment is entered by separate order.


Summaries of

Bowerman v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Sep 2, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-H-07-1925 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Bowerman v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN BOWERMAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division

Date published: Sep 2, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-H-07-1925 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 2, 2008)

Citing Cases

Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security

The presence of sciatica is confirmed by sciatic nerve pain radiating down the limb when the supine person…