affirming dismissal without leave to amend of a plaintiff's "frivolous" RICO claim because even if the defendant officials' alleged misconduct violated plaintiff's civil rights, their acts did not qualify as predicate acts of racketeering activity under § 1961
Summary of this case from Forte v. Merced Cnty.No. 97-1731.
June 22, 1998, OCTOBER TERM, 1997.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 125 F. 3d 800.
affirming dismissal without leave to amend of a plaintiff's "frivolous" RICO claim because even if the defendant officials' alleged misconduct violated plaintiff's civil rights, their acts did not qualify as predicate acts of racketeering activity under § 1961
Summary of this case from Forte v. Merced Cnty.Full title:BOWEN v. OISTEAD ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 22, 1998
To state a claim under RICO, it must be demonstrated "that the defendants engaged in at least two acts of…
Waynant v. Pac. Aquascapes1. On Page 4, Paragraph 2, Line 1, REPLACE “January 3, 2024” with “January 23, 2024”; 2. On Page 5,…