From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowen v. McKesson Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 8, 2013
CASE NO.: 1:12-CV-01906-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:12-CV-01906-LJO-SKO

04-08-2013

JERALD BOWEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, et al.; Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING

STIPULATED REQUEST TO

EXTEND DEFENDANTS' TIME

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS'

COMPLAINT PENDING

RESOLUTION OF MOTION TO

REMAND

This matter comes before the Court upon the parties' Stipulated Request to Extend Defendants' Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint Pending Resolution of Motion to Remand. Upon careful scrutiny, and for good cause shown, the Court finds the Stipulated Request well taken and grants the request.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The deadline for any Defendant to respond to the Complaint shall be continued until thirty (30) days after the entry of any order of this Court denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand; and

2. Should such Motion to Remand be granted, Defendants' time to respond to the Complaint shall be governed by the California Code of Civil Procedure, stipulation of counsel, and/or other court order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Bowen v. McKesson Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 8, 2013
CASE NO.: 1:12-CV-01906-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Bowen v. McKesson Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JERALD BOWEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 8, 2013

Citations

CASE NO.: 1:12-CV-01906-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2013)