From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boullard v. Swarthout

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 20, 2015
CV 14-2031-GW (RNB) (C.D. Cal. May. 20, 2015)

Opinion

         Decided: May 15, 2015.

          Landry Boullard, Petitioner, Pro se, Vacaville, CA.

          For G. Swarthout, Warden, Respondent: Toni R Johns Estaville, CAAG - Office of Attorney General, California Department of Justice, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          GEORGE H. WU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative First Amended Petition, the records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) respondent's Motion to Dismiss is granted; (2) petitioner's " Request for Leave for Petitioner's Motion for Stay and Abeyance" is denied as moot; and (3) Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Boullard v. Swarthout

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 20, 2015
CV 14-2031-GW (RNB) (C.D. Cal. May. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Boullard v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:LANDRY BOULLARD, Petitioner, v. G. SWARTHOUT, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: May 20, 2015

Citations

CV 14-2031-GW (RNB) (C.D. Cal. May. 20, 2015)