From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boule v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 11, 2010
Civil No. 09-355-JE (D. Or. Aug. 11, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-355-JE.

August 11, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge John Jelderks filed his Findings and Recommendation on July 20, 2010. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R. Civ P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. See § 636(b)(1)(C); Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174-75 (9th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Jelderks' Findings and Recommendation #18. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED; this action is remanded to the Commissioner for an award of benefits.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 11 day of August, 2010.


Summaries of

Boule v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 11, 2010
Civil No. 09-355-JE (D. Or. Aug. 11, 2010)
Case details for

Boule v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CAROL BOULE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Aug 11, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-355-JE (D. Or. Aug. 11, 2010)