From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bouck v. Stuck

Utah Court of Appeals
Dec 6, 2001
2001 UT App. 380 (Utah Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 20010346-CA.

FILED: December 6, 2001. (Not For Official Publication)

Fifth District, St. George Department, The Honorable James L. Shumate.

Lila Stuck, Hurricane, Appellant Pro Se.

Christopher W. Edwards, Hurricane, for Appellee.

Before Judges Greenwood, Jackson, and Davis.


MEMORANDUM DECISION


Appellant Lila Stuck appeals a judgment for unlawful detainer. This case is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary affirmance "on the basis that the grounds for review are so insubstantial as not to merit further proceedings or consideration by the appellate court." See Utah R. App. P. 10(a)(2).

At the time of trial, the trial court struck the appellant's answer and entered her default. The answer was properly stricken under Rule 12(f) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure as containing "redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter." Based upon our review of the entire trial court record, and our consideration of the response filed by appellant, we conclude that appellant has not demonstrated any alleged error or other issue that would support reversal of the judgment. Accordingly, appellant has not demonstrated that the appeal raises any substantial issue that would merit further consideration.

We grant the motion for summary disposition and summarily affirm the judgment.

WE CONCUR: Norman H. Jackson, Associate Presiding Judge, James Z. Davis, Judge.


Summaries of

Bouck v. Stuck

Utah Court of Appeals
Dec 6, 2001
2001 UT App. 380 (Utah Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Bouck v. Stuck

Case Details

Full title:John Bouck dba Willowind RV Park, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Lila Stuck…

Court:Utah Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 6, 2001

Citations

2001 UT App. 380 (Utah Ct. App. 2001)