From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bouchard v. Potter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Mar 20, 2012
C/A No.: 3:11-982-CMC-SVH (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 2012)

Opinion

C/A No.: 3:11-982-CMC-SVH

03-20-2012

Wendy A. Bouchard, Plaintiff, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General United States Postal Service, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter comes before the court on the motion [Entry #16] of Defendant to compel Plaintiff to respond to Interrogatories and Requests for Production served January 4, 2012. The motion indicates that the discovery requests were duly served and that full and complete responses have not been made within the time prescribed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. When no response was received, Defendant followed up by letters dated February 22 and March 1, 2012. [Entry ##16-3, 16-4]. Defendant received no response to those letters.

In light of the foregoing, the court grants the motion to compel. Plaintiff is directed to provide responses to the discovery request by April 3, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

March 20, 2012

Columbia, South Carolina

Shiva V. Hodges

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Bouchard v. Potter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Mar 20, 2012
C/A No.: 3:11-982-CMC-SVH (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Bouchard v. Potter

Case Details

Full title:Wendy A. Bouchard, Plaintiff, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General United…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 20, 2012

Citations

C/A No.: 3:11-982-CMC-SVH (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 2012)