From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bottom v. Bybee

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Jun 15, 1962
358 S.W.2d 542 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962)

Opinion

       Leonard E. Wilson, Jamestown, for appellant.


       Bell, Orrs&s Reynolds, Charles Reynolds, Bowling Green, Fred Faulkner, Jr., Campbellsville, for appellees.

       WILLIAMS, Judge.

       Following opening statement to the jury by counsel for appellant, the Green Circuit Court directed a verdict for the appellees. On appeal to this Court appellant designated only certain parts of the record, and did not serve with the designation a concise statement of points on which she intended to rely. Appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground a concise statement of points was not served was overruled by this Court. The appellees now argue that the points raised on the appeal are such that, had they been advised of them, they would have filed a counterdesignation and brought up other portions of the record. They again insist that the appeal should be dismissed. Upon reconsideration, we agree.

       In Knight v. Resolute Insurance Company, Ky. 321 S.W.2d 255, we said:

'Inasmuch as appellant has designated only certain parts of the record in the case for inclusion in the record on appeal, we are dismissing the appeal for failure to serve with the designation a concise statement of points as is required by CR 75.04.'

       Taylor v. Warman, Ky. 331 S.W.2d 899; Wallace v. Walterss&sKeene Motor Company, Ky. 280 S.W.2d 493.

       Wherefore, the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Bottom v. Bybee

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Jun 15, 1962
358 S.W.2d 542 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962)
Case details for

Bottom v. Bybee

Case Details

Full title:Edith BOTTOM, Appellant, v. Charles Yancy BYBEE et al., Appellees.

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Jun 15, 1962

Citations

358 S.W.2d 542 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962)

Citing Cases

Abell v. Meguire

les may be fairly administered only if strict compliance is required equally of all. They have sufficient…