From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boston Maine R. R. v. Gallagher

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Nov 4, 1913
88 A. 1000 (N.H. 1913)

Opinion

Decided November 4, 1913.

BILL IN EQUITY, to enjoin the defendants from entering the station and grounds of the plaintiff railroad, in Manchester, to solicit the carriage of baggage for passengers. The defendants demurred. The essential facts are the same as in Hedding v. Gallagher, 72 N.H. 377. Transferred without ruling from the May term, 1911, of the superior court by Plummer, J.

Branch Branch, for the plaintiffs.

James A. Broderick, for the defendants.


A majority of the court being of the opinion that the decision in Hedding v. Gallagher, 72 N.H. 377, should stand, there is no occasion to further consider the questions discussed therein.

A defence now made for the first time is that a decree for the plaintiffs will deprive the defendants of the rights guaranteed to them under the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States. No argument in support of this proposition has been furnished, and the authorities are decisive against it. Slaughter-house Cases, 16 Wall. 36.

Demurrer overruled.

All concurred.


Summaries of

Boston Maine R. R. v. Gallagher

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Nov 4, 1913
88 A. 1000 (N.H. 1913)
Case details for

Boston Maine R. R. v. Gallagher

Case Details

Full title:BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD a. v. DANIEL J. GALLAGHER a

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough

Date published: Nov 4, 1913

Citations

88 A. 1000 (N.H. 1913)
88 A. 1000

Citing Cases

Peterson v. Boston Maine Railroad

So far as we are aware this distinction has been consistently observed. See Wigmore on Evidence (3d ed.) §…

Follett v. Boston Maine Railroad

The plaintiff properly does not contend that Vermont P.L. § 6241, relative to ringing of bells or blowing of…