From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bostic v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Feb 8, 2000
10 S.W.3d 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED 75939.

February 8, 2000.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HON. FLOYD McBRIDE, JUDGE.

Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea L. Mazza, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and ROBERT E. CRIST, Sr. J.


[1

ORDER


Bobby Bostic (movant) appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the determination of the trial court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Bostic v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Feb 8, 2000
10 S.W.3d 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Bostic v. State

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY BOSTIC, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Feb 8, 2000

Citations

10 S.W.3d 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)