From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bosomburg v. Schultz

Appellate Court of Illinois
May 4, 1948
334 Ill. App. 620 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)

Opinion

Gen. No. 44,172. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed May 4, 1948 Released for publication June 4, 1948

CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT, § 73propriety of overruling motion to vacate judgment. Where plaintiff's verified answer to defendant's petition to vacate judgment by confession showed that defendant made no effort to have judgment opened until two months after defendant knew of judgment, and averments of answer, if taken as true, showed that defendant by false oral representation obtained from plaintiff execution of a document subordinating plaintiff's judgment lien to a mortgage on defendant's real estate, motion to vacate was properly overruled on ground that defendant did not comply with Supreme Court Rule providing that a party seeking to open a judgment by confession must show not only diligence but also a meritorious defense (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1945, ch. 110, par. 259.26; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 105.26).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. EUGENE HOLLAND, Judge, presiding.

Order affirmed. Heard in the second division, first district, this court at the October term, 1947.

Maximilian J. St. George, for appellant;

G.A. Bosomburg, pro se.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed May 4, 1948; released for publication June 4, 1948.


Summaries of

Bosomburg v. Schultz

Appellate Court of Illinois
May 4, 1948
334 Ill. App. 620 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
Case details for

Bosomburg v. Schultz

Case Details

Full title:G. A. Bosomburg, Appellee, v. Catherine R. Schultz, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: May 4, 1948

Citations

334 Ill. App. 620 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
79 N.E.2d 533