From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borshchevskiy v. Century Dev. Props.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 15, 2021
21-cv-8625 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-8625 (MKV)

12-15-2021

SERGIY BORSHCHEVSKIY, Plaintiff, v. CENTURY DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES LLC, RICHARD OHEBSHALOM, and FRED OHEBSHALOM, Defendants.


ORDER

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:

The parties have informed the Court that they have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 12]. Because the Complaint asserts claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., judicial approval is required for settlement. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 206 (2d Cir. 2015) (holding that FLSA settlements require the approval of either the district court or the United States Department of Labor). “In deciding whether to approve a stipulated settlement, the Court must scrutinize the settlement for fairness.” Boucaud v. City of New York, No 07-cv-11098 (RJS), 2010 WL 4813784, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2010).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that by January 28, 2022, the parties shall submit a joint letter to the Court explaining why the proposed settlement reflects a “fair and ‘reasonable compromise of disputed issues rather than a mere waiver of statutory rights brought about by an employer's overreaching.'” Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc., 900 F.Supp.2d 332, 335 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (quoting Mosquera v. Masada Auto Sales, Ltd., No. 09-cv-4925 (NGG), 2011 WL 282327, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 25, 2011)). Specifically, the parties should address the following factors:

(1) the plaintiff s range of possible recovery; (2) the extent to which “the settlement will enable the parties to avoid anticipated burdens and expenses in establishing their respective claims and defenses”; (3) the seriousness of the litigation risks faced by the parties; (4) whether “the settlement agreement is the product of arm's-length bargaining between experienced counsel”; and (5) the possibility of fraud or collusion.
Id. (quoting Medley v. Am. Cancer Soc, No. 10 Civ. 3214, 2010 WL 3000028, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2010)). The letter must also address whether there is a bona fide dispute as to the number of hours worked or the amount of compensation due and how much of the proposed settlement Plaintiffs attorney shall be seeking as fees. Cheeks, 796 F.3d at 203, 206. Absent special circumstances, the Court will not approve any settlement agreement that is filed under seal or in redacted form. Id. at 206.

All other dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Borshchevskiy v. Century Dev. Props.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 15, 2021
21-cv-8625 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Borshchevskiy v. Century Dev. Props.

Case Details

Full title:SERGIY BORSHCHEVSKIY, Plaintiff, v. CENTURY DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES LLC…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 15, 2021

Citations

21-cv-8625 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2021)