From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borozan v. Borozan

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
Mar 21, 2019
DOCKET NO. A-1265-17T2 (App. Div. Mar. 21, 2019)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. A-1265-17T2

03-21-2019

KIMBERLY M. BOROZAN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL J. BOROZAN, Defendant-Appellant.

Daniel B. Tune argued the cause for appellant (Martin & Tune, LLC, attorneys; Daniel B. Tune, of counsel and on the brief). Respondent has not filed a brief.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. Before Judges O'Connor and DeAlmeida. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Morris County, Docket No. FM-14-1222-15. Daniel B. Tune argued the cause for appellant (Martin & Tune, LLC, attorneys; Daniel B. Tune, of counsel and on the brief). Respondent has not filed a brief. PER CURIAM

Appellant having advised the court that he has withdrawn his appeal in this matter, the appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the original on file in my office.

CLERK OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION


Summaries of

Borozan v. Borozan

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
Mar 21, 2019
DOCKET NO. A-1265-17T2 (App. Div. Mar. 21, 2019)
Case details for

Borozan v. Borozan

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY M. BOROZAN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL J. BOROZAN…

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 21, 2019

Citations

DOCKET NO. A-1265-17T2 (App. Div. Mar. 21, 2019)