From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borough of Kenilworth v. Corwine

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Mar 7, 1951
96 F. Supp. 68 (D.N.J. 1951)

Opinion

Civ. No. 880-50.

March 7, 1951.

Earl Pollack, Elizabeth, N.J., for petitioner.

Alfred E. Modarelli, John J. Barry, Newark, N.J., for the United States.


Plaintiff instituted this action in the Superior Court of New Jersey, seeking strict foreclosure of fifteen tax sale certificates. The United States having removed the action to this court under the provisions of section 1444 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1444, moves to dismiss on the ground that the jurisdictional requirements of Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2410, are not met.

Under a statute formerly in effect, substantially similar to that embodied in 28 U.S.C.A. § 2410, Judge Avis of this court held that consent to be sued in a strict foreclosure proceeding had not been given by the United States, since the statute contemplated a judicial sale. Integrity Trust Co. v. United States, D.C.N.J. 1933, 3 F. Supp. 577. The United States, of course, cannot be made subject to suit unless the terms of its consent are strictly complied with. It follows, therefore, that this action must be dismissed as to the United States, and since the reason for removal no longer exists, the case will be remanded to the Superior Court of New Jersey.

Submit an order.


Summaries of

Borough of Kenilworth v. Corwine

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Mar 7, 1951
96 F. Supp. 68 (D.N.J. 1951)
Case details for

Borough of Kenilworth v. Corwine

Case Details

Full title:BOROUGH OF KENILWORTH v. CORWINE et al

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Mar 7, 1951

Citations

96 F. Supp. 68 (D.N.J. 1951)

Citing Cases

United States v. Morrison

On it, we are of the clear view that it would be out of keeping with the nature of an equitable proceeding of…

Miners Sav. Bank of Pittston, Pa. v. United States

One view: By the terms of the statute which must be strictly construed, the court could grant no relief…