From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borneisen v. Sedgwick Claims

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 12, 2001
806 So. 2d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding that plaintiff's claim failed because plaintiff "introduced no evidence that, if the agreement had not been breached, the venture itself would have otherwise been consummated."

Summary of this case from Alphamed Pharmaceuticals v. Arriva Pharmaceuticals
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Case No. 1D01-3890

Opinion filed December 12, 2001.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. William D. Douglas, Judge.

Mark G. Capron of Smith, Feddeler, Smith Miles, Lakeland, for appellant.

George A. Helm of Langston, Hess, Bolton, Znosko Helm, Maitland, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Raysor v. Raysor, 706 So.2d 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Coca-Cola Foods v. Cordero, 589 So.2d 961 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Borneisen v. Sedgwick Claims

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 12, 2001
806 So. 2d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

holding that plaintiff's claim failed because plaintiff "introduced no evidence that, if the agreement had not been breached, the venture itself would have otherwise been consummated."

Summary of this case from Alphamed Pharmaceuticals v. Arriva Pharmaceuticals
Case details for

Borneisen v. Sedgwick Claims

Case Details

Full title:LARRY BORNEISEN, Appellant, v. SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES and…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 12, 2001

Citations

806 So. 2d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Virtus Pharm. v. Woodfield Distribution, LLC

As to damages, a plaintiff in a breach of contract case must show that the defendant's breach was a…

Telemundo v. Spanish Telev. Serv

[e.s.] Baggett v. Davis, 124 Fla. 701, 717, 169 So. 372, 379 (1936). See Stensby v. Effjohn Oy Ab, 806 So.2d…

11 Citing Cases