From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BORK MFG. CO. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 27, 1952
194 F.2d 611 (9th Cir. 1952)

Opinion

No. 12796.

February 5, 1952. Rehearing Denied February 27, 1952.

F.W. James, Evanston, Ill. (George E. Lindelof, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel) for petitioner.

W.T. Kelley, Gen. Counsel, James W. Cassedy, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Jno. W. Carter, Jr., Atty., Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and ORR and POPE, Circuit Judges.


Bork Manufacturing Co., dealing in gambling devices, petitions this court for review of a cease and desist order issued by the Federal Trade Commission against it. The order appealed from reads as follows:

"It is Ordered that respondent * * * do forthwith cease and desist from:

"Selling or distributing in commerce, as `commerce' is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C.A. § 41 et seq.], punch boards, push cards, or other lottery devices which are to be used or may be used in the sale or distribution of merchandise to the public by means of a game of chance, gift enterprise, or lottery scheme."

The allegations of the complaint and the findings are the same in essential respects as those of the amended complaint and findings in Lichtenstein v. Federal Trade Commission, 9 Cir., 194 F.2d 607.

Petitioner admits that it had distributed in commerce the charged lottery devices but makes the same contentions as made in the Lichtenstein case.

For the reasons stated in that case, the order of the Federal Trade Commission is amended by striking therefrom the words "or may be used" and as so amended is affirmed.


Summaries of

BORK MFG. CO. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 27, 1952
194 F.2d 611 (9th Cir. 1952)
Case details for

BORK MFG. CO. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Case Details

Full title:BORK MFG. CO., Inc. et al. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 27, 1952

Citations

194 F.2d 611 (9th Cir. 1952)

Citing Cases

Feitler v. Federal Trade Commission

"Upon a review of the history of Section 5(a) in connection with the decisions of the court thereon, we are…

Consolidated Mfg. Co. v. Federal Trade Comm

The decision of the Court of Appeals of the Seventh Circuit is squarely in point here. So also are the…