From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boring v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2015
2:13-cv-01404-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2015)

Opinion

          Matthew Mellen (SBN: 233350) Jessica Galletta (SBN: 281179) Eunji Cho (SBN: 286710) MELLEN LAW FIRM

          SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation, Laszlo Ladi (Authorization for e- siganture given via email) Attorneys for Defendant NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC.

          REED SMITH LLP By: Britt Roberts Britt Roberts (Authorization for e- siganture given via email) Attorneys for Defendant BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


          JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND TRIAL RELATED DEADLINES

          Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Senior United States District Judge

         Plaintiff Carthel Dennis Boring (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (“Defendants”) (collectively Plaintiffs and Defendant may be referred to as the “Parties”) hereby stipulate and agrees as follows, subject to the Court’s approval.

         RECITALS

         1. WHEREAS, on April 16, 2014, the trial issued a Scheduling Order in this matter:

         2. WHEREAS, following, the Court’s Scheduling Order, the parties have been diligently engaging in discovery, by propounding written discovery and noticing the depositions of pertinent witnesses;

         3. WHEREAS, following the Court’s Order, Defendant began reviewing Plaintiff for a loan modification in an attempt to resolve this matter without the need for further litigation and a final decision has not yet been made by Defendant;

         4. WHEREAS additional time is needed to process Plaintiff’s loan modification application;

         5. WHEREAS the parties have not previously requested an extension of time on any of the discovery or trial related deadlines

         6. WHEREAS trial in this matter is currently scheduled for November 3, 2015

         7. WHEREAS, in an attempt to continue pursuing settlement negotiations without the need to expend exorbitant litigation expenses, the Parties wish to extend the following discovery and trial related deadlines as follows:

         a. Fact discovery cutoff………………………………July 6, 2015

         b. Designation of experts with reports…………….….July 6, 2015

         c. Designation of rebuttal experts with reports……….July 20, 2015

         d. Expert discovery cutoff……………………………August 14, 2015

         e. Last day for hearing on dispositive motions……….August 17, 2015

         f. Final Pretrial Conference…………………………..September 7, 2015 at 2:30 p.m.

         STIPULATION

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED TO that

         1. The following discovery and trial related deadlines shall be continued as follows::

         a. Fact discovery cutoff………………………………July 6, 2015

         b. Designation of experts with reports…………….….July 6, 2015

         c. Designation of rebuttal experts with reports……….July 20, 2015

         d. Expert discovery cutoff…………………………….August 14, 2015

         e. Last day for hearing on dispositive motions……….August 17, 2015

         f. Final Pretrial Conference…………………………..September 7, 2015 at 2:30 p.m.

         PROPOSED ORDER

         The Court, having read the above-stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

         1. The following discovery and trial related deadlines shall be continued as follows::

         a. Fact discovery cutoff………………………………July 6, 2015

         b. Designation of experts with reports…………….….July 6, 2015

         c. Designation of rebuttal experts with reports……….July 20, 2015

         d. Expert discovery cutoff…………………………….August 14, 2015

         e. Last day for hearing on dispositive motions……….August 24, 2015

         f. Final Pretrial Conference…………………………..October 26, 2015 at 11:00 a.m.. A joint pretrial statement shall be filed seven days prior to the hearing.

         g. Trial is rescheduled for December 1, 2015, at 9:00 a.m.


Summaries of

Boring v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2015
2:13-cv-01404-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2015)
Case details for

Boring v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC

Case Details

Full title:CARTHEL DENNIS BORING, an individual, Plaintiff, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 26, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-01404-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2015)