From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borger v. Kane

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 13, 1925
8 F.2d 362 (S.D.N.Y. 1925)

Opinion

August 13, 1925.

Cohen, Cole Weiss, of New York City (Harry J. Leffert, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Holley Oxenberg, of New York City, for defendants.


At Law. Action by John Borger against James J. Kane and others. On motion to set aside verdict for plaintiff. Motion denied.


This is a motion by defendants to set aside a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, rendered by a jury. Defendants claim that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.

Plaintiff entered a building with which he was unfamiliar, and proceeded to the office of his employers on the second floor. He desired to visit the toilet, and inquired from a fellow employee where it was located. This fellow employee informed him that it was entered through a door leading from the hall on the same floor. He then went into the hall and opened a door, expecting it to lead to his destination, and as he went through he was precipitated into an elevator shaft, through which he fell, sustaining injuries for which he brought this action. Upon these facts I am of the opinion that there was no contributory negligence.

After receiving these directions there was no reason for plaintiff to anticipate injury, if he followed them as given. He had the right to expect, as no other door was mentioned, that there would be but one which he was seeking, and inasmuch as his conduct involved no contributory negligence, as claimed, the motion to set aside the verdict must be and is denied.


Summaries of

Borger v. Kane

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 13, 1925
8 F.2d 362 (S.D.N.Y. 1925)
Case details for

Borger v. Kane

Case Details

Full title:BORGER v. KANE et al

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 13, 1925

Citations

8 F.2d 362 (S.D.N.Y. 1925)