From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bordner v. Commissioners

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc
Dec 27, 1932
18 P.2d 323 (Colo. 1932)

Opinion

No. 12,817.

Decided December 27, 1932.

Action to recover protested tax payment made on alleged excessive property assessment. Judgment of dismissal.

Affirmed.

1. TAXES AND TAXATION — Property — Equity in School Lands. An equity in school lands is a property right notwithstanding it may have no cash value. If of no value an assessment thereon for tax purposes would be merely excessive and not illegal.

2. Erroneous Assessment — Remedy. A taxpayer complaining of an alleged excessive property assessment, must seek administrative relief afforded by statute before he can appeal to the courts.

3. Erroneous Assessment — Pleading. Complaint in an action to recover taxes paid under protest and alleged to have been based on an erroneous assessment, is fatally defective where it does not contain the indispensable allegation that administrative remedies have been invoked.

Error to the District Court of Baca County, Hon. A. C. McChesney, Judge.

Messrs. GRANT, ELLIS, SHAFROTH TOLL, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. ARRAJ REYNOLDS, Mr. CLARENCE L. IRELAND, Attorney General, Mr. CHARLES ROACH, Deputy, Mr. FRED A. HARRISON, Assistant, for defendant in error.


WILLIAM S. Bordner sued the board of county commissioners of Baca county to recover $466.22, being the total protested tax payments made during the years 1922 to 1928 inclusive upon the equity in certain school lands, contending that said taxes were based upon assessments which were void because "plaintiff owed a greater debt upon said lands than the value of said lands" and that "plaintiff did not own an equity in said lands of any value whatsoever." A demurrer to this complaint was sustained and the cause dismissed, a review of which is here sought.

The action is based upon section 7447, C. L. of '21, which provides: "In all cases where any person shall pay any tax, interest or cost, or any portion thereof, that shall thereafter be found to be erroneous or illegal, whether the same be owing to erroneous assessment, to improper or irregular levying of the tax, or clerical or other errors or irregularities, the board of county commissioners shall refund the same without abatement or discount to the taxpayer."

Section 7193, C. L. of '21 provides: "That all equities in state and school lands purchased under contract taken from the state shall, during the life of the contract, be taxed at their full cash value * * *." The validity of this statute was not questioned.

The complaint charges that plaintiff's equity in such land was taxed. Such equity is a property right notwithstanding it may have no cash value. If of no value, an assessment thereof would be merely excessive and not illegal.

In such circumstances the taxpayer must first seek administrative relief afforded by statute and in the absence of allegation and proof of such action cannot recover.

Although the complaint alleges that the taxes were paid under protest, it does not contain the indispensable allegation that any administrative remedy was invoked. First National Bank v. Patterson, 65 Colo. 166, 176 Pac. 498; Union Nat. Bank v. Commissioners, 75 Colo. 298, 225 Pac. 851; People v. District Court, 87 Colo. 316, 287 Pac. 849; First Nat. Bank v. Weld County, 264 U.S. 450, 44 Sup. Ct. 385, 68 L. Ed. 784.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Bordner v. Commissioners

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc
Dec 27, 1932
18 P.2d 323 (Colo. 1932)
Case details for

Bordner v. Commissioners

Case Details

Full title:BORDNER v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BACA COUNTY

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc

Date published: Dec 27, 1932

Citations

18 P.2d 323 (Colo. 1932)
18 P.2d 323

Citing Cases

Denver v. Boettcher

The City and County of Denver had a right to tax the reversionary interest, and having such right, the tax…

Weidenhaft v. Commissioners

His difficulty in this respect was first presented when he drew his pleadings; again when the case was heard…