From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borden v. Kent

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Jun 18, 2003
No. 10-03-054-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 18, 2003)

Opinion

No. 10-03-054-CV.

Opinion delivered and filed June 18, 2003.

From the 56th District Court, Galveston County, Texas, Trial Court # 98CV0004.

Before Chief Justice DAVIS, Justice VANCE, and Justice GRAY.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Bridgett Borden and her husband Robert filed suit against Jan Kent for malicious prosecution. A jury rendered a take-nothing verdict in favor of Kent. The court signed a judgment in accordance with the verdict, and the Bordens appealed.

The Bordens have now filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) provides:

(a) The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:

(1) On Motion of Appellant. In accordance with a motion of appellant, the court may dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order unless such disposition would prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.

Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(1).

The Bordens' dismissal motion satisfies the requirements of the appellate rules. Kent has not filed a response. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal with appellate costs to be taxed against the Bordens. See id. 42.1(d).

Appeal dismissed


Summaries of

Borden v. Kent

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Jun 18, 2003
No. 10-03-054-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 18, 2003)
Case details for

Borden v. Kent

Case Details

Full title:BRIDGETT BORDEN AND ROBERT BORDEN, Appellants v. JAN KENT, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco

Date published: Jun 18, 2003

Citations

No. 10-03-054-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 18, 2003)