From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boomer v. N.Y. St. Police Dept

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 19, 2009
60 A.D.3d 1218 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 503364.

March 19, 2009.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Platkin, J.), entered May 9, 2007 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition.

Gregory Boomer, Attica, appellant pro se. Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Frank K. Walsh of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Malone Jr. and Stein, JJ.


In 2006, petitioner, an inmate at Attica Correctional Facility in Wyoming County, filed a request under the Freedom of Information Law ( see Public Officers Law art 6) for "a copy of `the lab log book,' in and out entries . . . received [on July 11, 1991]." Following a search of its files, respondent informed petitioner that it was unable to locate a "lab log book," but did provide him with two evidence submission records and two return receipts pertinent to the case numbers he had referenced in his request. Dissatisfied with that response, petitioner appealed to the Records Appeal Officer of the Division of State Police. His appeal was denied by William Callahan, the State Police Administrative Director, who advised him that, notwithstanding a second diligent search, the requested lab book could not be located. Petitioner subsequently commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to compel respondent to provide him with the lab book. Granting respondent's motion, Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal.

We affirm. Petitioner concedes, in his pro se brief to this Court, that certification of its inability to locate the requested document following a diligent search satisfied respondent's obligation pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law ( see Public Officers Law § 89 [a]; Matter of Rattley v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 873, 875). Consequently, petitioner's request to compel is moot ( see Matter of Fuentes v Fischer, 56 AD3d 919, 920-921).

Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent that they are properly before us, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Boomer v. N.Y. St. Police Dept

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 19, 2009
60 A.D.3d 1218 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Boomer v. N.Y. St. Police Dept

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GREGORY BOOMER, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE POLICE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 19, 2009

Citations

60 A.D.3d 1218 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 1894
875 N.Y.S.2d 334

Citing Cases

Oddone v. Suffolk Cnty. Police Dep't

Thus, the respondent argued, the revised affidavit went above and beyond what is required under FOIA,…

In re Ernest Curry

The Supreme Court properly denied the petitioner's motion to hold the respondents in civil contempt without…