From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boodt v. Borgess

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 12, 2007
480 Mich. 908 (Mich. 2007)

Opinion

No. 132688.

October 12, 2007.

Reported below: 272 Mich App 621.


Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal October 12, 2007:

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the applications or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court and holding that the notice of intent met the requirements of MCL 600.2912b with regard to defendant Lauer. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.


Summaries of

Boodt v. Borgess

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 12, 2007
480 Mich. 908 (Mich. 2007)
Case details for

Boodt v. Borgess

Case Details

Full title:MELISSA BOODT, as Personal Representative of the Estate of David Waltz…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Oct 12, 2007

Citations

480 Mich. 908 (Mich. 2007)