From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bontemps v. Salinas

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 17, 2013
2:10-cv-2345 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2013)

Opinion


GREGORY C. BONTEMPS, Plaintiff, v. SALINAS, et al., Defendants. No. 2:10-cv-2345 JAM DAD P United States District Court, E.D. California. June 17, 2013

          ORDER

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On April 5, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed April 5, 2013, are adopted in full;

         2. Defendants' motions to revoke plaintiff's IFP status (Doc. Nos. 24 & 26) are denied; and

         3. Defendants are directed to file an answer in this action within twenty-one days.


Summaries of

Bontemps v. Salinas

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 17, 2013
2:10-cv-2345 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Bontemps v. Salinas

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY C. BONTEMPS, Plaintiff, v. SALINAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 17, 2013

Citations

2:10-cv-2345 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2013)