From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bontemps v. LyVelsom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2793 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2793 CKD P

01-24-2013

GREGORY C. BONTEMPS, Plaintiff, v. DALE L. LyVELSOM, Defendant.


ORDER

By an order filed November 20, 2012, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within thirty days. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Dkt. No. 3.) Plaintiff's consent to this court's jurisdiction was subsequently filed. (Dkt. No. 4.) The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis nor paid the filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

____________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Bontemps v. LyVelsom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2793 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Bontemps v. LyVelsom

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY C. BONTEMPS, Plaintiff, v. DALE L. LyVELSOM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2793 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)