From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonnett v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Feb 14, 2012
362 S.W.3d 27 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 96346.

2012-02-14

Gregory BONNETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, John F. Garvey, Jr., Judge.Jessica Hathaway, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.


Supreme Court Denied March 27, 2012.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, John F. Garvey, Jr., Judge.Jessica Hathaway, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J. and MARY K. HOFF and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Bonnett (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to introduce evidence of prior consensual sex with the victim to the jury.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Bonnett v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Feb 14, 2012
362 S.W.3d 27 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Bonnett v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gregory BONNETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Date published: Feb 14, 2012

Citations

362 S.W.3d 27 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)