From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonner v. Union Pacific Flexible Benefits Program

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 9, 2010
Civil Case No. 09-364-SU (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 09-364-SU.

August 9, 2010

Gary Lynn Bonner, Nampa, Idaho, Pro Se Plaintiff.

Brian D. Black, Robert O. King, Thomas M. Christina, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak Stewart, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, Kimberly R. Griffith, Timothy J. Coleman, Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Defendants.


ORDER


The Honorable Patricia Sullivan, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on July 19, 2010. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation dated July 19, 2010 (#66) in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#63) is granted. Defendants' Counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Bonner v. Union Pacific Flexible Benefits Program

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 9, 2010
Civil Case No. 09-364-SU (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Bonner v. Union Pacific Flexible Benefits Program

Case Details

Full title:GARY LYNN BONNER, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PROGRAM…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Aug 9, 2010

Citations

Civil Case No. 09-364-SU (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2010)