From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonilla v. Yuba Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 20, 2018
No. 2: 18-cv-2546 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2: 18-cv-2546 MCE KJN P

12-20-2018

STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, Plaintiff, v. YUBA COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 19, 2018, the undersigned recommended that this action be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to file an in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee. (ECF No. 9.) On December 10, 2018, plaintiff filed an in forma pauperis application. (ECF No. 10.) Good cause appearing, the November 19, 2018 findings and recommendations are vacated.

The court has recently learned that plaintiff is not permitted to proceed in forma pauperis because he has "struck out" pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Bonilla v. Lively, 4: 11-cv-3180 CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011). In the instant action, plaintiff also does not allege that he is under "imminent danger of serious physical injury." See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the November 19, 2018 findings and recommendations (ECF No. 9) are vacated; and ////

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 10) be denied;

2. Plaintiff be ordered to pay the filing fee within fourteen days of the adoption of these findings and recommendations.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: December 20, 2018

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Bon2546.vac


Summaries of

Bonilla v. Yuba Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 20, 2018
No. 2: 18-cv-2546 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2018)
Case details for

Bonilla v. Yuba Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, Plaintiff, v. YUBA COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 20, 2018

Citations

No. 2: 18-cv-2546 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2018)