Opinion
No. 2: 18-cv-2260 KJN P
10-12-2018
STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, Plaintiff, v. TROY L. NUNLEY, et al., Defendants.
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
By an order filed August 28, 2018, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty days period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed the required documents.
On September 13, 2018 plaintiff filed a motion to compel and a motion for issuance of an order to show cause. These motions do not respond to the order directing plaintiff to file an in forma pauperis application.
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: October 12, 2018
/s/_________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Bon2260.fifp