From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonilla v. Annucci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 25, 2012
9:11-CV-159 (DNH/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 25, 2012)

Opinion

9:11-CV-159 (DNH/RFT)

09-25-2012

ANGELO BONILLA and ANTHONY YOUNG, Plaintiffs, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, Executive Deputy Commissioner; JOHN NUTTALL, Deputy Commissioner for Program; LUCIEN LeCLAIRE, JR., Facility Operations; MARK LEONARD, Director of Ministerial Service; JAMES A. NICHOLS, Mid-Orange Correctional Facility; K.F. KELLER, Former Acting Superintendent of Mid-Orange; and BRIAN FISCHER, Department of Correctional Services, Defendants.

APPEARANCES: ANGELO BONILLA Plaintiff, Pro Se ANTHONY YOUNG Plaintiff, Pro Se Riverview Correctional Facility HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York OF COUNSEL: ADELE M. TAYLOR-SCOTT, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General Attorney for Defendants The Capitol


APPEARANCES: ANGELO BONILLA
Plaintiff, Pro Se
ANTHONY YOUNG
Plaintiff, Pro Se
Riverview Correctional Facility
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General for the State of New York
OF COUNSEL: ADELE M. TAYLOR-SCOTT, ESQ.
Ass't Attorney General
Attorney for Defendants
The Capitol
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge

To date, defendant K.F. Keller has not been properly served with process, thus no appearance has been made by defendants' counsel on his behalf. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 56 at p. 1, n. 1.

DECISION and ORDER

Plaintiffs brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 16, 2012, the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, advised, by Report-Recommendation, that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part as follows: granted as to defendant James A. Nichols and that he be dismissed from the action; granted as to the First Amendment and Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act ("RLUIPA") claims based upon the restrictions on displaying Nations of Gods and Earth ("NGE") symbols, Universal Flag, and texts; denied as to the First Amendment and RLUIPA claims based upon the restrictions on NGE congregative opportunities and on wearing crowns; denied as to all equal protection claims; and that defendant K.F. Keller be dismissed from the action as the claims against him are now moot. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.

Plaintiffs are members of the NGE. The Report-Recommendation provides an overview and history of the NGE.
--------

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Therefore it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;

2. All claims against defendants James A. Nichols and K.F. Keller are DISMISSED;

3. The First Amendment and RLUIPA claims based upon the restrictions on displaying NGE symbols, Universal Flag, and texts are DISMISSED;

4. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED as follows:

(a) The First Amendment and RLUIPA claims based upon the restrictions on NGE congregative opportunities and on wearing crowns; and
(b) The equal protection claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 25, 2012

Utica, New York.

_______________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bonilla v. Annucci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 25, 2012
9:11-CV-159 (DNH/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Bonilla v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO BONILLA and ANTHONY YOUNG, Plaintiffs, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 25, 2012

Citations

9:11-CV-159 (DNH/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 25, 2012)

Citing Cases

Lombardo v. Freebern

" (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1(a)) (footnote omitted)). While "RLUIPA does not define 'substantial burden,'…

Joseph v. Fischer

In a case in the Northern District of New York challenging some of these same restrictions on NGE activity,…