From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonifacio v. 356 West Wireless Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 7, 2021
21-CV-4502 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-4502 (VSB)

07-07-2021

PRISCILIANO CRISTOBAL BONIFACIO, Plaintiff, v. 356 WEST WIRELESS INC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff filed this action on May 19, 2021, (Doc. 1), and filed affidavits of service on June 16 and June 17, 2021, (Docs. 5-6). The deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs complaint was July 1, 2021. (See Docs. 5-6.) To date, Defendants have not appeared or responded to the complaint. Plaintiff, however, has taken no action to prosecute this case. Accordingly, if Plaintiff intends to seek a default judgment, she is directed to do so in accordance with Rule 4(H) of my Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases by no later than July 21, 2021. If Plaintiff fails to do so or otherwise demonstrate that she intends to prosecute this litigation, I may dismiss this case for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bonifacio v. 356 West Wireless Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 7, 2021
21-CV-4502 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Bonifacio v. 356 West Wireless Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PRISCILIANO CRISTOBAL BONIFACIO, Plaintiff, v. 356 WEST WIRELESS INC, et…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 2021

Citations

21-CV-4502 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2021)