From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bond v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb 24, 2012
84 So. 3d 355 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 5D11–2654.

02-24-2012

Carl D. BOND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Carl D. Bond, South Bay, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Carl D. Bond, South Bay, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

COHEN, J.

Carl Bond challenges by habeas petition his conviction for lewd and lascivious act in the presence of a child, a conviction that was obtained twenty years ago. He claims that the arresting officer, assistant state attorney, and trial judge did not comply with the filing of an oath of office as required by section 876.05, Florida Statutes (1991). Bond suggests there was no authority to arrest, charge, prosecute, try or sentence him.

We explained the proper procedure required to raise such a claim in Johnson v. Office of the State Attorney, 987 So.2d 206 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). While Johnson addressed a similar challenge brought as a quo warranto action, its reasoning as to the untimeliness of Bond's challenge is equally applicable.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., and MONACO, J., concur.


Summaries of

Bond v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb 24, 2012
84 So. 3d 355 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Bond v. State

Case Details

Full title:Carl D. BOND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Feb 24, 2012

Citations

84 So. 3d 355 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)