From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bond v. Laser Spine Institute, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 11, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1086 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 11, 2010)

Summary

denying LSI's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Henderson v. Laser Spine Institute LLC

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1086.

August 11, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 11th day of August, 2010, for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Quash Service of Process and to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue (Doc. No. 7) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Bond v. Laser Spine Institute, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 11, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1086 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 11, 2010)

denying LSI's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Henderson v. Laser Spine Institute LLC

In Bond, LSI had a Philadelphia “consult” office and took a more active role in that plaintiff's post-surgical treatment.

Summary of this case from Paterno v. Institution
Case details for

Bond v. Laser Spine Institute, LLC

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY BOND and MARY ANN BOND, Plaintiffs, v. LASER SPINE INSTITUTE, LLC…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 11, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1086 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 11, 2010)

Citing Cases

Paterno v. Institution

Moreover, the plaintiff does not even allege that LSI had a presence in this State through any of the…

Paterno v. Institution

The court reasoned that plaintiff had not shown his treatment arose from any transaction of business in New…