From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

B.O.L.T. v. City of Rancho Cordova

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2015
2:14-cv-01588-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)

Opinion

          PORTER | SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Terence J. Cassidy, Kristina M. Hall, Sacramento, California, Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, RANCHO CORDOVA POLICE DEPARTMENT, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL GOOLD, G. LANE, SCOTT R. JONES, S. CARROZZO, M. JAMES, and S. PADGETT.

          Gary W. Gorski, LAW OFFICES OF GARY W. GORSKI, Sacramento, CA, Daniel M. Karalash, Strategic Law Command, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING, FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND FOR SERVICE OF SAME

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their undersigned Counsel, pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 143 and 144 as follows:

1) The parties have met and conferred regarding deficiencies and ambiguities in the First Amended Complaint filed.

2) In the interest of expediting this matter, the parties agree that a Second Amended Complaint would expedite the law and motion process, and resolve any technical deficiencies.

3) Defendants' responsive pleading and/or motion as to the First Amended Complaint is currently due Monday, February 2, 2015.

4) The parties respectfully request that the Court extend the time for Defendants to file a responsive pleading and/or motion up to and including February 23, 2015.

5) The parties stipulate and further respectfully request that the Court grant Plaintiffs leave to file a Second Amended Complaint by February 10, 2015, with a draft emailed to Defendants on February 3, 2015, for the purposes of further meet and confer.

6) This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and any facsimile or electronic signature shall be as valid as an original signature.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         Having reviewed the above stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Defendants to respond to the operative Complaint in this action be, and hereby is, extended to February 23, 2015;

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Plaintiffs referenced Second Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than February 10, 2015.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

B.O.L.T. v. City of Rancho Cordova

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2015
2:14-cv-01588-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)
Case details for

B.O.L.T. v. City of Rancho Cordova

Case Details

Full title:B.O.L.T. an unincorporated association of motorcycle riders and…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 2, 2015

Citations

2:14-cv-01588-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)