From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BOLLACK v. SOCIETE GENERALE POUR FAVORISER LE

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 1944
56 N.E.2d 253 (N.Y. 1944)

Opinion

Argued May 16, 1944

Decided June 8, 1944

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, SCHMUCK, J.

Joseph R. Kelley and Ann Nollen for appellant.

Harold W. Bissell and William C. Cannon for respondent.


Order affirmed, without costs, and question certified answered in the negative on the ground that the issues are of such nature and scope as to indicate the propriety of a trial thereof. No opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ. Taking no part: RIPPEY, J.


Summaries of

BOLLACK v. SOCIETE GENERALE POUR FAVORISER LE

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 1944
56 N.E.2d 253 (N.Y. 1944)
Case details for

BOLLACK v. SOCIETE GENERALE POUR FAVORISER LE

Case Details

Full title:GEORGES BOLLACK, Appellant, v. SOCIETE GENERALE POUR FAVORISER LE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 8, 1944

Citations

56 N.E.2d 253 (N.Y. 1944)
56 N.E.2d 253

Citing Cases

M. W. Zack Metal Co. v. Federal Insurance

Plaintiff abandoned the steel by letter dated March 17, 1960. The decisive consideration here is whether…

Segal v. National City Bank of New York

There is no proof in this record that the answers are feigned and not genuine. Under such circumstances, the…