From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bolich v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jan 15, 2014
No. 63618 (Nev. Jan. 15, 2014)

Opinion

No. 63618

01-15-2014

THOMAS BOLICH, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from an order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Brent T. Adams, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).

In his petition filed on January 29, 2013, appellant challenged the validity of his March 7, 2008, judgment of conviction. We conclude that the district court did not err in denying the petition because appellant was not in custody in the case designated when he filed the petition. Jackson v. State, 115 Nev. 21, 23, 973 P.2d 241, 242 (1999); see also Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6(1) (providing that the district courts may issue a writ of habeas corpus on petition by "any person who is held in actual custody in their respective districts, or who has suffered a criminal conviction in their respective districts and has not completed the sentence imposed pursuant to the judgment of conviction"). Moreover, as a separate and independent ground to deny relief, we conclude that the petition was procedurally time barred and without good cause. See NRS 34.726(1); Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 252-53, 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003). Accordingly, we

Appellant indicated that he was in the custody at the Clark County Detention Center awaiting new charges when he filed his January 29, 2013, petition.

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
--------

__________, J.

Hardesty

__________, J.

Douglas

__________, J.

Cherry
cc: Hon, Brent T. Adams, District Judge

Thomas Bolich

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Bolich v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jan 15, 2014
No. 63618 (Nev. Jan. 15, 2014)
Case details for

Bolich v. State

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS BOLICH, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 15, 2014

Citations

No. 63618 (Nev. Jan. 15, 2014)