Boles v. Dansdill

Full title: RUSSELL M. BOLES, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD DANSDILL, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Feb 12, 2008

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01661-LTB-CBS (D. Colo. Feb. 12, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01661-LTB-CBS.

February 12, 2008

ORDER

CRAIG SHAFFER, Magistrate Judge

This civil action comes before the court on Mr. Boles' "Motion" (filed February 8, 2008) (doc. # 144). Pursuant to the Order of Reference dated October 20, 2006 (doc. # 58) and the memorandum dated February 11, 2008 (doc. # 146), this matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge. The court has reviewed the Motion, Defendants' Response (filed February 11, 2008) (doc. # 145), and the entire case file and is sufficiently advised in the premises.

Mr. Boles seeks "a directive to the warden" of Sterling Correctional Facility "to provide me with a working typewriter or wordprocessor and adequate law library time." Defendants do not object to Mr. Boles serving handwritten discovery requests. Mr. Boles indicates that he has "had (4) four two hour appointments to access the law library in the last nine or ten weeks." Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Mr. Boles' "Motion" (filed February 8, 2008) (doc. # 144) is DENIED as unnecessary.