From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boice v. Warnstedt

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 2, 1997
696 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-2420

Opinion filed July 2, 1997

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Alfred J. Horowitz, Judge; L.T. Case No. 92-2627 09.

Drew M. Levitt and Dena R. Taub, Deerfield Beach, for appellant.

Scott Alan Orth of Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick Schneider, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee.


We reverse an order granting Appellee's motion to quash service of process and vacating a default and final judgment for lack of jurisdiction over the person.

The record reflects that notwithstanding faulty service, and after entry of the default judgment, Appellee appeared by counsel, who filed an appearance and moved for relief from the default and judgment without questioning service of process. The default was entered in August, 1995. In September, Appellee filed his first motion to set aside the default. This motion was rejected and the judgment was entered. Appellee's counsel then filed a motion to vacate the final judgment and for reconsideration of his motion to set aside the clerk's default, again without challenging the service of process, which was denied.

In April of 1996, Appellee moved for reconsideration or for relief from judgment under rule 1.540, his third motion for relief without mentioning service of process. He also filed an answer and affirmative defenses, apparently as a proposed answer in the event relief were granted, still without mentioning defective service. It was not until the following month that Appellee sought to quash service.

Clearly, Appellee's failure to contest service of process at the earliest opportunity constituted a waiver of that issue. See,e.g., Cumberland Software, Inc. v. Great American Mortg. Corp., 507 So.2d 794 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Weinroth, 422 So.2d 330 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). See also Fundaro v. Canadiana Corp., 409 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Tampa Associates, Ltd. v. Miami Elevator Co., 545 So.2d 458 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); EFG Tampa Associates v. Bohlen, 532 So.2d 1318 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Bay City Management, Inc. v. Henderson, 531 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

We remand for the trial court to reinstate the final judgment.

STONE, C.J., FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Boice v. Warnstedt

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 2, 1997
696 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Boice v. Warnstedt

Case Details

Full title:LAUREN BOICE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF GRANT BOICE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 2, 1997

Citations

696 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Bank of America v. Lane

Chancelor v. BWC Invs., 57 So.3d 969, 971 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Because appellees participated in the…