From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bohlig v. Schmitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 1958
5 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

April 21, 1958


In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and for conscious pain and suffering, the appeal is from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the administratrix. The intestate, a tenant in appellants' building, was injured when he fell down an outside stairway appurtenant to said building, which injury it is alleged caused his death. There was testimony that the accident happened about 8:00 P.M. on October 6, 1951, that the intestate was accompanied by the administratrix and that the stairway was inadequately lighted and had no handrail. Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed. The findings of fact are affirmed. No claim was made or established that appellants violated any statutory duty. At common law "there is no duty of an owner to light common ways absent some defective condition, unusual hazard or peculiar danger" ( Kimbar v. Estis, 1 N.Y.2d 399, 403; see, also, McCabe v. Mackay, 253 N.Y. 440, 233 App. Div. 101; Landes v. Barone, 283 App. Div. 207, affd. 307 N.Y. 867; Hirschler v. Briarcliff Management Corp., 275 App. Div. 422, affd. 300 N.Y. 680). The mere absence of a handrail on an exterior stairway is not a defective condition, an unusual hazard or a peculiar danger (see Indinali v. Lerner, 243 App. Div. 735; cf. Landes v. Barone, supra). Wenzel, Acting P.J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bohlig v. Schmitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 1958
5 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Bohlig v. Schmitt

Case Details

Full title:SELMA BOHLIG, as Administratrix of the Estate of FREDERICK BOHLIG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 21, 1958

Citations

5 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Riederer v. Schulmann Props. Int'l

Once a party has submitted competent proof demonstrating that there is no substance to its opponent's claims…

McBride v. Jewell

The Supreme Court properly instructed the jury not to consider the absence of a handrail on one side of the…