From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bohannon v. Haynes

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 16, 2023
3:23-cv-120-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 16, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-cv-120-DPM

11-16-2023

DENNIS BOHANNON PLAINTIFF v. NICK HAYNES DEFENDANT


ORDER

D.P. MARSHALL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1. Bohannon sues Haynes under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Bohannon says he was fired, even though he had done nothing wrong, after Haynes assaulted him on the job.

2. This Court, however, does not have the power -subject matter jurisdiction-to handle this case. Bohannon hasn't presented a question of federal law. 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Haynes can't be individually liable under Title VII because he is not an employer. 42 U.S.C. §2000e(b); Spencer v. Ripley County State Bank, 123 F.3d 690, 691 (8th Cir. 1997). And because Bohannon and Haynes are both Arkansas lawyers, there is no jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship, either. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1).

3. The Court will therefore dismiss Bohannon's complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3).

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Bohannon v. Haynes

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 16, 2023
3:23-cv-120-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Bohannon v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS BOHANNON PLAINTIFF v. NICK HAYNES DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 16, 2023

Citations

3:23-cv-120-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 16, 2023)